DDTG-16 Micro Tubular Linear Actuator
DDTG-28 Micro Tubular Linear Actuator
DDTG-38 Micro Tubular Linear Actuator
Stroke length and travel distance are often used interchangeably, but they are not the same. Stroke length refers to the maximum linear movement an actuator can achieve internally (from fully retracted to fully extended), while travel distance refers to the actual movement achieved in your application system. In real-world designs, travel distance is frequently less than stroke length due to mounting geometry, linkages, and mechanical constraints.
Understanding this distinction is critical—misinterpreting it leads to undersized actuators, limited motion range, or system interference.
Stroke length is a fixed specification defined by the actuator manufacturer.
Total extension range of the actuator rod
Internal mechanical limits (end-of-stroke positions)
Built-in limit switch range
For example:
A 200 mm stroke actuator can extend exactly 200 mm from its fully retracted position
Determined by internal design (lead screw length, housing)
Cannot be adjusted without redesigning the actuator
Directly impacts overall actuator length (retracted vs extended size)
Think of stroke length as the maximum available motion envelope.
Travel distance describes how far your mechanism actually moves when the actuator operates.
Mounting position
Pivot points and linkages
Angle of operation
Mechanical stops in the system
In many applications, travel distance is a fraction of stroke length.
In systems using pivot arms or scissor mechanisms:
Small actuator movement can produce larger or smaller output motion
Motion is not 1:1
Example:
A 100 mm stroke actuator may produce only 60 mm vertical lift
Or, in leverage systems, it could produce 150 mm movement
If the actuator is installed at an angle:
Not all stroke contributes to usable motion
Part of the stroke is “lost” in geometry
This is common in:
Automotive applications
Adjustable furniture
Industrial automation arms
In professional designs:
Actuators are rarely used at full stroke
Designers leave buffer zones to prevent mechanical stress
Effective travel distance is intentionally reduced to improve reliability.
This is where many selection errors happen.
Example: You need 300 mm vertical lift
Identify pivot points and angles
Determine motion ratio (input vs output)
If linkage ratio = 0.7
Required stroke = 300 mm ÷ 0.7 ≈ 430 mm
Typically 10%–20%
Final selection ≈ 450–500 mm stroke actuator
System cannot reach required position
Limited functionality
Potential mechanical strain at end positions
This often results in:
Redesign costs
Replacement of actuators
Delayed project timelines
Oversizing also creates problems:
Increased actuator size and cost
Reduced structural rigidity
Risk of interference with surrounding components
Unused stroke range
More stroke is not always better—it must match the system.
No, they are related but different.
Stroke length = movement distance
Extension length = total length when fully extended
Similarly:
Retracted length = actuator size when closed
These dimensions are critical for:
Space planning
Installation constraints
Stroke length indirectly influences performance:
Longer stroke → higher bending forces → reduced load stability
Longer stroke → potential speed variation depending on design
However:
Load capacity and speed are primarily determined by motor and gearing
Stroke length affects mechanical behavior, not just motion range
Yes—depending on the mechanism.
In leverage systems:
Output motion can exceed actuator stroke
Example:
Scissor lifts
Hinged arms
But this comes with trade-offs:
Reduced force output
Increased mechanical complexity
No. The relationship varies widely depending on application design.
Stroke ≈ travel distance (1:1 ratio)
Stroke < or > travel distance
Stroke translates into angular motion
This is why actuator selection must always be done at the system level, not just based on actuator specs.
Define:
Required travel distance
Direction of movement
Load conditions
Use:
CAD simulation
Motion analysis tools
Engineering calculations
Always leave:
5%–10% buffer at both ends
This prevents:
Mechanical stress
Limit switch overuse
Check:
Retracted length
Extended length
Clearance during motion
Assuming stroke = travel distance
Ignoring mounting geometry
Not accounting for safety margins
Selecting based only on catalog specs
Overlooking interference in full extension
These mistakes often lead to:
System redesign
Reduced actuator lifespan
Unexpected performance issues
Is stroke length always equal to travel distance?
No. Stroke length is the actuator’s internal movement range, while travel distance depends on how the actuator is integrated into the system.
How much longer should stroke be than required travel?
Typically 10%–20% longer, depending on system design and safety requirements.
Can I limit the stroke length of an actuator?
Yes. External limit switches or control systems can restrict motion within a shorter range.
What is the most common mistake when selecting stroke length?
Assuming a 1:1 relationship between actuator movement and system movement without analyzing the mechanism.
Does stroke length affect actuator lifespan?
Yes. Operating near full stroke continuously can increase wear on limit switches and internal components.
Stroke length defines what the actuator can do. Travel distance defines what your system actually achieves.
The key to proper selection is:
Translating system motion requirements into actuator stroke
Accounting for geometry, safety margins, and mechanical constraints
Avoiding the assumption of a direct 1:1 relationship
For engineers and buyers, mastering this distinction prevents costly errors and ensures that the actuator integrates seamlessly into the overall system design—delivering both performance and reliability over the long term.
